• Complex
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
  • Scholars
  • Journal
  • ISSN
  • Conference
搜索

Author:

Liu, J. (Liu, J..) | Chen, C. (Chen, C..) | Lin, J. (Lin, J..) | Yang, Z. (Yang, Z..)

Indexed by:

EI Scopus SCIE

Abstract:

The existing constitutive models of shape memory alloy (SMA) cannot accurately describe the mechanical behavior in martensitic strengthening segment since their loading and unloading paths in strengthening segment completely overlap. This study proposes a multi-segment linear mathematical model for SMA, which realizes the separation of loading path and unloading path in strengthening segment. A four-story steel frame structure and corresponding braced structures with various SMA constitutive models are designed, and seismic control effects of SMA braces with these models are analyzed and compared through time history analysis. The results show that the sub-cycle unloading mode of SMA constitutive model affects the seismic mitigation capacity of SMA brace in a certain extent. The position of the inflection point of unloading path has very little influence on the structural control ability of SMA braces. The SMA brace using the SMA constitutive model with a single linear sub-cyclic unloading path has the minimal seismic response and the highest seismic reduction ratio. For most evaluation indexes, the seismic mitigation ability calculated by the proposed path separation constitutive model is in the middle of the results calculated by the existing models. SMA models without considering the mechanical behavior of strengthening segment may lead to an erroneous estimation of the energy consumption of SMA brace and the structural damage. The difference of simulation results among various SMA constitutive models is almost independent with ground motion. © The Author(s) 2024.

Keyword:

seismic control constitutive model comparison analysis shape memory alloy steel frame structure

Author Community:

  • [ 1 ] [Liu J.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
  • [ 2 ] [Liu J.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin, China
  • [ 3 ] [Chen C.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
  • [ 4 ] [Chen C.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin, China
  • [ 5 ] [Lin J.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China
  • [ 6 ] [Lin J.]Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin, China
  • [ 7 ] [Yang Z.]National Key Laboratory of Bridge Safety and Resilience, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

Reprint Author's Address:

Email:

Show more details

Related Keywords:

Source :

Advances in Structural Engineering

ISSN: 1369-4332

Year: 2024

Issue: 5

Volume: 27

Page: 835-853

2 . 6 0 0

JCR@2022

Cited Count:

WoS CC Cited Count: 0

SCOPUS Cited Count: 1

ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All

WanFang Cited Count:

Chinese Cited Count:

30 Days PV: 5

Affiliated Colleges:

Online/Total:861/10646219
Address:BJUT Library(100 Pingleyuan,Chaoyang District,Beijing 100124, China Post Code:100124) Contact Us:010-67392185
Copyright:BJUT Library Technical Support:Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd.