• Complex
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
  • Scholars
  • Journal
  • ISSN
  • Conference
搜索

Author:

Shen, Y. (Shen, Y..) | Hesham, El, Naggar, M. (Hesham, El, Naggar, M..) | Zhang, D. (Zhang, D..) | Huang, Z. (Huang, Z..) | Du, X. (Du, X..)

Indexed by:

EI Scopus SCIE

Abstract:

Relating the ground motion intensity measure (IM) and the structural engineering demand parameter is a crucial step in the performance-based earthquake engineering framework. This study investigates the selection of IM for development of probabilistic seismic demand model of urban shield tunnels subjected to earthquake ground motions in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Nonlinear dynamic effective stress analyses are conducted to develop a database of the intensity measures and structural seismic responses exposed to ground shaking and soil liquefaction. Two advanced soil constitutive models (i.e., Pressure DependMultiYield03 and PressureIndependMultiYield for liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils, respectively) are employed to capture the nonlinear behavior. A suite of 23 ground motion intensity measures is selected and assessed based on the evaluation criteria of correlation, efficiency, practicality and proficiency. Eventually, the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is employed to comprehensively consider the four evaluation criteria and establish the optimal ground motion IM suitable for probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures. The obtained results show that the sustained maximum acceleration is the optimal IM for evaluating the structural seismic response, followed by the peak ground acceleration in both liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils. Peak pseudo velocity spectrum, displacement square integral and Housner spectral intensity are found to be not suitable for the probabilistic seismic demand analysis of shield tunnel structures. © 2024 Tongji University

Keyword:

Probabilistic seismic demand analysis Fuzzy optimization Shield tunnel Ground motion intensity measures Liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils

Author Community:

  • [ 1 ] [Shen Y.]Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  • [ 2 ] [Hesham El Naggar M.]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western University, London, N6A3K7, Canada
  • [ 3 ] [Zhang D.]Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  • [ 4 ] [Zhang D.]State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  • [ 5 ] [Huang Z.]Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  • [ 6 ] [Du X.]Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

Reprint Author's Address:

Email:

Show more details

Related Keywords:

Source :

Underground Space (new)

ISSN: 2096-2754

Year: 2025

Volume: 21

Page: 149-163

6 . 4 0 0

JCR@2022

Cited Count:

WoS CC Cited Count:

SCOPUS Cited Count: 13

ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All

WanFang Cited Count:

Chinese Cited Count:

30 Days PV: 7

Affiliated Colleges:

Online/Total:320/10626017
Address:BJUT Library(100 Pingleyuan,Chaoyang District,Beijing 100124, China Post Code:100124) Contact Us:010-67392185
Copyright:BJUT Library Technical Support:Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd.