The　accuracy　of　the　constitutive　model　affects　the　precision　of　the　finite　element　analysis.　Four　advanced　sand　constitutive　models-the　DM04　model,　the　SANISAND-MS　model　with　memory　surface　(MS),　the　SANISAND-Sf　model　with　semi-fluidized　state　(Sf),　and　the　SANISAND-MSf　model　with　both　memory　surface　and　semi-fluidized　state-are　examined　in　this　article　based　on　a　comparison　of　simulation　and　experiment　results　of　element　tests.　First,　four　constitutive　models　are　implemented　in　OpenSees,　and　the　constitutive　models　are　calibrated　based　on　the　cyclic　loading　experiments　of　Karlsruhe　fine　sand.　After　that,　the　advantages　and　disadvantages　of　four　constitutive　models　under　different　test　conditions　are　analyzed.　Finally,　the　finite　element　model　of　the　LEAP-UCD-2017　(Liquefaction　Experiments　and　Analysis　Project,　University　of　California　Davis,　2017)　centrifuge　test　is　established　to　evaluate　the　performance　of　the　four　constitutive　models　for　solving　boundary　value　problems.　It　is　found　that　the　SANISAND-MSf　model　can　well　reproduce　the　undrained　cyclic　properties.