Correction　to:　Scientific　Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50078-4,　published　online　17　December　2023　The　original　version　of　this　Article　contained　errors　in　Table　2　and　in　the　Reference　list.　In　Table　2,　for　the　construct　“Actual　use　of　5G”,　the　‘Cronbach＇s　alpha’,　‘Composite　reliability’,　and　‘Average　variance　extracted’　values　were　omitted.　Additionally,　the　source　was　incorrect.　The　correct　and　incorrect　values　appear　below.　Incorrect:　(Table　presented.)　Construct　Item　FL　α　CR　AVE　Source　Actual　use　of　5G　(AU5G)　[26]　AU5G1　I　will　continue　to　keep　using　5G　technology　0.722　AU5G2　I　have　used　5G　technology　which　gives　me　benefits　0.860　AU5G3　As　far　as　I　know,　5G　services　are　useful　0.928　AU5G4　I　would　recommend　other　people　to　use　5G　0.863　Correct:　(Table　presented.)　Construct　Item　FL　α　CR　AVE　Source　Actual　Use　of　5G　(AU5G)　0.858　0.904　0.701　[23]　AU5G1　I　will　continue　to　keep　using　5G　technology　0.722　AU5G2　I　have　used　5G　technology　which　gives　me　benefits　0.860　AU5G3　As　far　as　I　know,　5G　services　are　useful　0.928　AU5G4　I　would　recommend　other　people　to　use　5G　0.863　Due　to　an　error　during　manuscript　preparation,　all　References　were　interchanged.　In　addition,　the　Authors　omitted　the　below　Reference,　which　is　now　listed　as　Reference　2:　F.　Rizzato,　5G　users　on　average　consume　up　to　2.7×　more　mobile　data　compared　to　4G　users　(2020).　The　previous　Reference　2　is　retained　as　Reference　7:　Shah,　S.　K.,　Zhongjun,　P.　T.,　Oláh,　J.,　Popp,　J.　&　Acevedo-Duque,　Á.　The　relationship　between　5G　technology　affordances,　consumption　values,　trust　and　intentions:　An　exploration　using　the　TCV　and　S-O-R　paradigm.　Heliyonhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14101　(2023).　As　a　result,　all　subsequent　references　have　been　renumbered　and　the　Reference　list　has　been　reorganized　to　ensure　all　references　are　cited　at　the　correct　position　in　the　text.　The　original　Article　has　been　corrected.　©　The　Author(s)　2024.