China＇s　relaunch　of　the　Certified　Voluntary　Emission　Reduction　(CCER)　market　is　essential　to　the　operation　of　the　carbon　emission　trading　market.　Traditional　single　policy　effect　evaluation　models　cannot　comprehensively　reflect　the　economic　and　environmental　impacts　brought　about　by　China＇s　restart　of　the　CCER　market.　To　effectively　assess　the　comprehensive　policy　effects　of　introducing　the　CCER　into　the　carbon　trading　mechanism　in　the　power　industry,　it　is　necessary　to　construct　a　coupled　model　for　policy　effect　evaluation.　Therefore,　against　the　backdrop　of　China＇s　restart　of　the　CCER　market　and　utilizing　China＇s　2020　input–output　table,　we　have　developed　a　comprehensive　assessment　model.　This　model　couples　a　dynamic　recursive　computable　general　equilibrium　model　with　a　greenhouse　gas　and　air　pollution　interactions　and　synergies　model　to　analyze　the　effects　of　introducing　CCERs　into　the　carbon　trading　mechanism　in　the　power　industry　on　the　economy,　energy,　residents＇　welfare,　and　environmental　health.　Results　show　that　restarting　the　CCER　market　leads　to　a　gradual　increase　in　the　gap　between　the　price　of　carbon　allowances　and　the　price　of　CCERs.　Carbon　trading　and　the　CCER　mechanism　exert　a　considerable　inhibiting　effect　on　the　growth　of　total　energy　consumption,　and　the　proportion　of　nonfossil　energy　on　the　consumption　side　is　forecasted　to　exceed　80%　by　2060.　In　terms　of　residents＇　welfare,　the　introduction　of　CCERs　into　the　carbon　trading　mechanism　does　not　substantially　improve　the　welfare　level　of　residents　but　drastically　reduces　the　level　of　residents＇　carbon　emissions.　Furthermore,　this　study　confirms　that　CCER　restart　can　successfully　stimulate　pollutant　emission　reduction　and　effectively　reduce　the　number　of　attributable　deaths,　which　in　turn　enhances　health　benefits.　We　also　provide　targeted　recommendations　for　the　restart　of　the　CCER　market　regarding　the　proportion　of　CCER　offsets,　the　structure　of　population　consumption,　and　regional　emission　reduction　policies　to　help　facilitate　the　smooth　operation　of　the　carbon　trading　market.　©　2025　The　Authors